CSRD & ESRS

CSRD Phase-In Timeline: Who Reports When

By ESG Training Institute Editorial 4 min read
Share this article
CSRD Phase-In Timeline: Who Reports When
A comprehensive guide to the four waves of CSRD implementation, detailing reporting deadlines, scope criteria, and compliance requirements for EU and non-EU entities.
Executive summary
  • Phased Implementation: The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) rolls out in four distinct waves from 2024 to 2028, based on company si
Building skills in this area? Enroll in CSRP — the leading certification for this topic.
Enroll now

ze, listing status, and revenue.

  • Double Materiality: All entities in scope must report according to the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), requiring a double materiality assessment of both impact and financial risk.
  • Assurance Requirement: Unlike previous frameworks, CSRD mandates limited assurance from the first year of reporting, with a planned transition to reasonable assurance.
  • Global Reach: Non-EU parent companies with significant EU turnover (over €150 million) fall under Wave 4, marking a significant expansion of extraterritorial regulatory reach.

Why It Matters

The CSRD replaces the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), expanding the number of companies required to provide sustainability disclosures from approximately 11,000 to nearly 50,000. For CFOs and compliance officers, the timeline is not merely a filing deadline but a countdown for data infrastructure development. Failure to align with the specific phase-in dates risks regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and restricted access to capital markets as investors increasingly rely on ESRS-aligned data for Article 8 and 9 fund classifications under the SFDR.

The Standard / Framework in Detail

The CSRD framework is built upon the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), developed by EFRAG. The reporting obligations are determined by the entity's classification under the Accounting Directive.

Scope Criteria

An entity is generally considered a "large undertaking" if it exceeds at least two of the following three criteria:

  1. Balance sheet total: > €25 million
  2. Net turnover: > €50 million
  3. Average number of employees: > 250

Note: These thresholds were recently adjusted upward by the European Commission to account for inflation.

Reporting Dimensions

Reporting must be integrated into the Management Report, not a standalone sustainability report. It must be provided in a digital, machine-readable format (XHTML) using the XBRL taxonomy to facilitate data aggregation by the European Single Access Point (ESAP).

Implementation Roadmap

Wave 1: NFRD Entities (FY 2024, Reporting 2025)

Entities already subject to the NFRD—primarily large public-interest entities with more than 500 employees—must begin collecting data on January 1, 2024. This group includes listed companies, banks, and insurance providers.

Wave 2: Other Large Undertakings (FY 2025, Reporting 2026)

All other "large" EU undertakings that were not previously subject to the NFRD. This includes large private companies that meet the size criteria mentioned above. This wave represents the largest volume of newly regulated entities.

Wave 3: Listed SMEs (FY 2026, Reporting 2027)

Listed Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs), small and non-complex credit institutions, and captive insurance undertakings. Listed SMEs have an "opt-out" possibility until 2028, provided they explain why the sustainability reporting was not provided.

Wave 4: Non-EU Parent Companies (FY 2028, Reporting 2029)

Non-EU companies with a net turnover in the EU exceeding €150 million for two consecutive years, and which have at least one large subsidiary or a branch in the EU with a turnover exceeding €40 million. This requires reporting at the consolidated global level of the non-EU parent.

Free download

The 2026 ESG Reporting & Assurance Playbook

A 42-page practical guide covering IFRS S1/S2, CSRD/ESRS and ISSA 5000 — written for finance, audit and sustainability teams.

Get the guide

Common Pitfalls

  • Underestimating Data Granularity: Many firms assume existing GRI or SASB data is sufficient. ESRS requires significantly more granular data points, particularly regarding Value Chain (Scope 3) impacts.
  • Delayed Materiality Assessments: Waiting until the reporting year to conduct a double materiality assessment often leads to rushed results that fail auditor scrutiny.
  • Ignoring the Value Chain: CSRD requires disclosures on the upstream and downstream value chain. Companies often fail to engage suppliers early enough to secure necessary primary data.
  • Assurance Readiness: The jump from voluntary reporting to mandated limited assurance is steep. Internal controls over non-financial data often lack the rigor of financial reporting controls.

Case Snapshot

Entity: A mid-sized German manufacturing firm (Private, 400 employees, €60m turnover). Status: Previously exempt under NFRD. Timeline: Falls under Wave 2. Challenge: The firm initially believed they had until 2027 to report. Upon analysis, they realized their FY 2025 data (starting Jan 1, 2025) must be audit-ready. Outcome: The firm initiated a gap analysis in Q3 2023, identifying that 40% of required ESRS data points were not currently tracked, specifically regarding circular economy metrics (ESRS E5).

What to Do This Quarter

  1. Confirm Your Wave: Audit your entity’s size, turnover, and listing status against the updated EU thresholds to determine your specific first reporting year.
  2. Conduct Double Materiality: Begin the assessment to identify which ESRS topical standards are material. This defines the scope of your data collection.
  3. Gap Analysis: Compare your current sustainability disclosures against ESRS requirements. Identify "blind spots" in data collection, particularly in the supply chain.
  4. Engage Internal Audit: Involve your internal audit team or external assurance providers early to review the robustness of your data collection processes.

Further Reading

For technical specifications, professionals should consult the EFRAG implementation guidance on double materiality and value chain reporting. The European Commission’s Q&A on the implementation of the EU corporate sustainability reporting rules provides essential clarity on legal interpretations of the directive.

Frequently asked questions

Related ESG standards
Take it further

Become a certified specialist on this topic.

Enroll in Certified Sustainability Reporting Professional (CSRP) or request a corporate training programme for your team.

References & sources

  1. EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (Official Text)
  2. EFRAG - European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
  3. European Commission - Sustainability Reporting FAQ

Join the conversation

Sign in to comment and discuss this analysis with other ESG professionals.

Sign in to comment